Jump to content


Here comes the Boise State circle jerk


95 replies to this topic

#1 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:31 PM

it won't end this year and will rival Tebow's from last year and USC's from the years before.

fuck.

#2 Techsan

    Peter North's Idol

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,186 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:40 PM

Based on Week 1, Boise would run a train on the Big 12 South this year.
Surfshack certified, less than 25% gay.

#3 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:46 PM

no

#4 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:48 PM

Frank Beamer is an overrated Goiter holder with NO ability to win a "big" game.

Don't project that upon all of us.

#5 Techsan

    Peter North's Idol

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,186 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:48 PM

QUOTE (Thethreeyardout @ Sep 6 2010, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
no


If anyone in the B12S would have played BSU this week, they would have lost. Period.
Surfshack certified, less than 25% gay.

#6 HeyMoe

    dirty aggie bastard

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,729 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:50 PM

Sorry, still not convinced. They play one or two toughies a year and play pudknockers the rest of the time. There is no fuckin way, with a collection of one and two star players, that they hold their own in the Big 12 South or SEC. You can get pumped up and play one , maybe two games a year vs top competition and win if you play out of your minds, but you'd have a hard time getting up to that emotional frenzy every week in a real conference.

Also, VT butchered the clock on their last drive. WTF?


And Boise's uni suck major ass.




* Here's another question; does anyone ever say NO to Nike? Does Nike ever walk into a room at a school with some crazy-ass uniform design and hear "Get the fuck outta here with that shit!"
***************************************************************************

#7 HeyMoe

    dirty aggie bastard

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,729 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:54 PM

QUOTE (Techsan_02 @ Sep 6 2010, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If anyone in the B12S would have played BSU this week, they would have lost. Period.


Euless Trinity would have torn them a new asshole.

***************************************************************************

#8 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:01 PM

If Frank Beamer....the "special teams guru" could put a field goal kicker on the field, or not run into the punter, this game isn't close.

You don't understand how bad this is now that ESPN has something to sink their teeth into.

#9 dag

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,712 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:02 PM

play bamas schedule...penn st, arky, florida, tennessee, auburn, old miss (suck after the first game but still a legit team), fsu

#10 dag

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,712 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:04 PM

btw, why didn't the pac-10 go after them?

#11 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:08 PM

cuz they are a team from Idaho

#12 Techsan

    Peter North's Idol

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,186 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:11 PM

QUOTE (Thethreeyardout @ Sep 6 2010, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If Frank Beamer....the "special teams guru" could put a field goal kicker on the field, or not run into the punter, this game isn't close.

You don't understand how bad this is now that ESPN has something to sink their teeth into.


I hate this argument.

'If X team hadn't fucked up, then Y team wouldn't have won/wouldn't have kept it close/etc etc.'

Of course not, that is football, that is sports. If every single team played and coached every single down perfectly, then every game would end in a 0-0 tie.
Surfshack certified, less than 25% gay.

#13 Techsan

    Peter North's Idol

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,186 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:13 PM

QUOTE (dag @ Sep 6 2010, 11:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
play bamas schedule...penn st, arky, florida, tennessee, auburn, old miss (suck after the first game but still a legit team), fsu


Any team, not just Boise would be hard pressed to do well against a schedule like that.
Surfshack certified, less than 25% gay.

#14 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:15 PM

Ok, how 'bout this.

Texas has a WAY better defense than either of these teams and a game with either would be play called to their weaknesses....and our special teams would have not have had such problems.



Texas beats both these teams.


I don't know if Tech does or not, but don't make that a "big 12s" problem.

We win this game vs. either team.

#15 HeyMoe

    dirty aggie bastard

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,729 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:18 PM

QUOTE (Thethreeyardout @ Sep 6 2010, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If Frank Beamer....the "special teams guru" could put a field goal kicker on the field, or not run into the punter, this game isn't close.

You don't understand how bad this is now that ESPN has something to sink their teeth into.



Understand please, this is how the rest of us feel about texas being being crammed down our throats all the time......
***************************************************************************

#16 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:21 PM

QUOTE (HeyMoe @ Sep 6 2010, 11:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Understand please, this is how the rest of us feel about texas being being crammed down our throats all the time......


fair enough.

believe it or not, this type of thinking begat Texas leaving the Big 12 and TAMU being invited to the SEC.

Texas can't STAND not having all of the attention....I will give you that.

#17 dag

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,712 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:21 PM

i'd rather listen to espn talk about boise, tebow or anything other than the goddamn sips

#18 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:22 PM

good thing you only have one tv set.

#19 HeyMoe

    dirty aggie bastard

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,729 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:23 PM



QUOTE
Texas can't STAND not having all of the attention...


And all the money.

And all the clout.


Which is why I now agree with your idea from a couple of months back that they may be on their way to independence.

***************************************************************************

#20 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:25 PM

for better or worse

I think for worse....but realistically we are looking at another year or two from 4 super conferences from which will impregnate a play off.

#21 Aggies98tards54

    Super Stud

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 787 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:25 PM

You honestly think texas, who struggled with Rice, would beat BSU right now? Objectivity isn't your thing.

#22 Techsan

    Peter North's Idol

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,186 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:26 PM

QUOTE (Thethreeyardout @ Sep 6 2010, 11:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ok, how 'bout this.

Texas has a WAY better defense than either of these teams and a game with either would be play called to their weaknesses....and our special teams would have not have had such problems.



Texas beats both these teams.


I don't know if Tech does or not, but don't make that a "big 12s" problem.

We win this game vs. either team.


Well, there is no convincing you that Rice isn't in the same galaxy as BSU or VT, but based on what I saw, UT wouln't have pulled off a W against BSU or VT this weekend.
Surfshack certified, less than 25% gay.

#23 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:29 PM

Jesus.

yeah, how we did vs. Rice.....having 17 freshmen in the two deep and trying out an entire new set of offensive play calls would have been EXACTLY the same if we had a marquis game either here or on the road.

come on man...this isn't play station.

#24 Techsan

    Peter North's Idol

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,186 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:33 PM

QUOTE (Thethreeyardout @ Sep 6 2010, 11:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Jesus.

yeah, how we did vs. Rice.....having 17 freshmen in the two deep and trying out an entire new set of offensive play calls would have been EXACTLY the same if we had a marquis game either here or on the road.

come on man...this isn't play station.


Exactly. You're going to make any and all arguments to make sure that in this make believe UT vs. BSU/VT scenario that UT absolutely would not lose to either of them. I say, if UT would have opened away from home, at a not so neutral site, against either of those teams, they would not have won.
Surfshack certified, less than 25% gay.

#25 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:36 PM

I don't believe that UT is the only Big 12 s team that would have beat either one of these teams tonight.

Boozing, shut up...seriously.

#26 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:37 PM

fucking Play station has ruined this game for many of you.

#27 Techsan

    Peter North's Idol

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,186 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:43 PM

QUOTE (Thethreeyardout @ Sep 6 2010, 11:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't believe that UT is the only Big 12 s team that would have beat either one of these teams tonight.

Hostile, shut up...seriously.


Who impressed out of the Big 12 S?

UT had a not so dominating win over Rice
A&M and BU played a Southland Conference team
Tech wasn unimpressive against SMU
OU struggled with a WAC team
OSU was the most 'impressive' against WSU

Back to my original point, BSU would have handled any B12S team this weekend. Play station or not.
Surfshack certified, less than 25% gay.

#28 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:46 PM

back to my original post

"no"

at least here at Texas we play better defense than that and special teams than that.

we would have beat either team, and I believe that other teams in this conference would have as well.

Nothing but Obama is more over rated that Frank Beamer.

#29 dag

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,712 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:52 PM

the sips would've struggled mightily against boise tonight. here's why. vtech moved the ball mostly because tyrod's mobility gave the vtech offense the only demension that moved the ball. overall, boise shut down pocket passing and williams running. grapes couldn't move outside the pocket like that to make the plays. and as good as the tu secondary is, they just couldn't hold off kellen moore every play. he would eventually find his man.

also, the sips don't have 1/10th the running game vtech has. taylor was the leading rusher. boise controlled the line on both sides most of the game. tu's o-line isn't stellar right now. it would have been a low scoring game, that's for sure. at the end of the day, tu has a GREAT defense, but a lackluster offense. boise is very good on both sides. i just don't see tu winning...maybe later in the year with added experience

#30 Thethreeyardout

    Super Stud

  • core
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,242 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 11:59 PM

Texas DL would have handled the game and their DB's would have stuck on that cover one that Va Tech had no clue on.

Sorry, Techsan, but we would have not fucked up on special teams the way Va Tech did tonight and our running game might have had some light vs those 275 DT's from Idaho.

This wouldn't have been a contest.

Because Tech is re-inventing itself does not mean the rest of us, namely the ones that have been to multiple national championship games, would have folded vs. either of these two.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users