My sources are telling me that this Tex/Notre Dame
#1
Posted 19 May 2010 - 04:25 PM
These guys are looking to hit a huge lick and hit it together for the next 20 years, where ever they go.
This is from one of those guys that makes shit like this happen for a living.
those of you that know, know.
write this down.
#2
Posted 19 May 2010 - 07:05 PM
#3
Posted 19 May 2010 - 07:29 PM
To the "We think our shit doesn't stink" conference.
#4
Posted 19 May 2010 - 08:13 PM
Oh, you mean the Big 10.
silly me.
#5
Posted 19 May 2010 - 10:04 PM
That's right, Northwestern makes more money playing football right now than Notre Dame does.
The Big 12 members make half of what Notre Dame makes in football.
There is a HUGE monetary reason to go to the Big 10, but, if Texas and Notre dame are a package deal, they will command the highest bidder.
Couple of cash cows sewn up for a few decades makes any TV deal better than the one we have.
This isn't just because of what the Big 10 guy did today, this has been on the down low since the season ended and the SEC signed ABC/ESPN/CBS.
#6
Posted 19 May 2010 - 10:09 PM
#7
Posted 19 May 2010 - 10:17 PM
#8
Posted 19 May 2010 - 10:29 PM
That's right, Northwestern makes more money playing football right now than Notre Dame does.
The Big 12 members make half of what Notre Dame makes in football.
There is a HUGE monetary reason to go to the Big 10, but, if Texas and Notre dame are a package deal, they will command the highest bidder.
Couple of cash cows sewn up for a few decades makes any TV deal better than the one we have.
This isn't just because of what the Big 10 guy did today, this has been on the down low since the season ended and the SEC signed ABC/ESPN/CBS.
Is texas/ notre dame a package deal? Seems like the Big 10 could add ND, stop at 12 teams , and no geographic oddities like a team from the deep southwest.
If they add texas they have 13 teams, who's the 14th?
#9
Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:09 PM
I have a hard time believing Texas goes anywhere without TAMU as long as the PUF is in place and politicians from both schools control that.
Yes, that is what I am saying....I don't know if they land in the Big 10, though that is who seems to want them the most, but I do know that the heavy hitters at UT and Notre Dame have been discussing changing the landscape of college football programing together since that ESPN deal with the SEC.
They have the Big Fox and NBC at their disposal, and the Big Fox just lost all of the BCS bowl games.
#10
Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:39 PM
I'm starting to wonder if this might not be the giant shift everyone thinks.
Might it just be this? ---
*Notre Dame joins the Big 10. The Big 10 stops there. They have twelve teams and it all makes sense geographically.
*Texas uses the threat of moving elsewhere to force the Big 12 to either let them put together their own network or if the conference forms the Big 12 network, the revenue sharing is weighed according to eyes on tv sets. In either case, texas wins. fuckers.
*Tech and Baylor change into a clean set of underwear.
*Mizzou and Nebraska get the Heisman from the Big 10. As I read somewhere...."the Big 10 is interested in steak, not hamburger." Other than some tv sets in St. Louis (the ones in East St. Louis have all been stolen), Missouri brings little to the table. Nebraska is Mizzou without the meth and even fewer tv sets. By the way, when did Missouri become the Harvard of the Midwest? Talk about an outsized opinion of yourself.
*The SEC, having seen that all the Big 10 did was add ND and nothing else, stands pat.
*Colorado gazes to the PAC 10 and realizes their dream of smoking bud with the hip-eyes at Cal have once again been thwarted.
*A&M fans like me can only look wistfully at SEC games on Saturday. Who do we play this week......Kansas?....oh goody.
#11
Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:49 PM
I don't know where this ends up and Texas leveraging a package deal to their advantage might be all that happens, but I have heard from one of the guys that does this sort of thing that they have been dealing with Notre Dame since the ESPN signing with the SEC.
The current national exposure that we in the Big 12 get when our teams compete is just not acceptable, and when still ANOTHER network signs on with the SEC and our esteemed "Bebee" is left looking for a deal with the food network, shit gets done without him.
Especially with no play off and polling and Heisman balloting are such a product of media attention.
#12
Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:55 PM
Also fucking stupid is the fact we're on TV less than every other college football team and most high schools.
We need a Big 12 Network like meat curtains needs vaginoplasty. These TV exclusivity windows that the Big 12 has need to be done away with. That's the stupidest fucking idea ever and whoever put it in our TV contract should be forced to suck a creampie out meat curtains's surf.
#13
Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:57 PM
#14
Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:58 PM
#15
Posted 20 May 2010 - 12:01 AM
#16
Posted 20 May 2010 - 12:02 AM
I'm starting to wonder if this might not be the giant shift everyone thinks.
Might it just be this? ---
*Notre Dame joins the Big 10. The Big 10 stops there. They have twelve teams and it all makes sense geographically.
*Texas uses the threat of moving elsewhere to force the Big 12 to either let them put together their own network or if the conference forms the Big 12 network, the revenue sharing is weighed according to eyes on tv sets. In either case, texas wins. fuckers.
*Tech and Baylor change into a clean set of underwear.
*Mizzou and Nebraska get the Heisman from the Big 10. As I read somewhere...."the Big 10 is interested in steak, not hamburger." Other than some tv sets in St. Louis (the ones in East St. Louis have all been stolen), Missouri brings little to the table. Nebraska is Mizzou without the meth and even fewer tv sets. By the way, when did Missouri become the Harvard of the Midwest? Talk about an outsized opinion of yourself.
*The SEC, having seen that all the Big 10 did was add ND and nothing else, stands pat.
*Colorado gazes to the PAC 10 and realizes their dream of smoking bud with the hip-eyes at Cal have once again been thwarted.
*A&M fans like me can only look wistfully at SEC games on Saturday. Who do we play this week......Kansas?....oh goody.
That's probably the single best post in the history of the InterTubes. it makes solid sense and it does so with style. It's got about 12 funny things going for it. Jeebus Palomino, HM. Nice work.
#17
Posted 20 May 2010 - 12:35 AM
*The old Big 8 teams bore the piss outta me. Yeah, I know all the resentment has run the other way, but I don't care. I get fired up for two games a year....tech, texas and that's it. I can't even get my blood up for OU and they've beaten us like Ike Turner the last decade.
*I hate....fucking hate this aerial-circus shit. Maybe now that that asswipe Leach is gone we might have some sanity return to offensive football around here. Saw where Mack is talking about having horn OBs take the ball more from under center. And naturally the sip spin machine makes it sound like texas is the trendsetter here. Typical. In any case, anything that moves us away from pussyball is fine with me.
* I'm spitballing here......but how about a couple of things to make things more interesting in this conference? How bout telling Baylor and Iowa State to go get their fuckin shinebox and shrink this thing to 10 teams? Then, how bout getting rid of the divisions and play 9 conference games a year? Have the top 2 play for the title. Everybody plays everybody every year. That's how rivalries are made. And ou and nebraska would play again every year, it would be great for the conference and might stop Tom Osbourne's bleeding. At least for a while.
* OR, re-shuffle the divisions every 5 or 6 years. Swap OU and Nebraska, tech and CU. Something.
*Games on Big Fox would rock. Games on Fox Sports Net are so badly produced I can swear I see HSE banners in the stadium.
#18
Posted 20 May 2010 - 03:25 AM
It is indeed.
Gald to see your crazy ass isn't dead.
#19
Posted 20 May 2010 - 08:09 AM
#20
Posted 20 May 2010 - 08:32 AM
*The old Big 8 teams bore the piss outta me. Yeah, I know all the resentment has run the other way, but I don't care. I get fired up for two games a year....tech, texas and that's it. I can even get my blood up for OU and they've beaten us like Ike Turner the last decade.
*I hate....fucking hate this aerial-circus shit. Maybe now that that asswipe Leach is gone we might have some sanity return to offensive football around here. Saw where Mack is talking about having horn OBs take the ball more from under center. And naturally the sip spin machine makes it sound like texas is the trendsetter here. Typical. In any case, anything that moves us away from pussyball is fine with me.
* I'm spitballing here......but how about a couple of things to make things more interesting in this conference? How bout telling Baylor and Iowa State to go get their fuckin shinebox and shrink this thing to 10 teams? Then, how bout getting rid of the divisions and play 9 conference games a year? Have the top 2 play for the title. Everybody plays everybody every year. That's how rivalries are made. And ou and nebraska would play again every year, it would be great for the conference and might stop Tom Osbourne's bleeding. At least for a while.
* OR, re-shuffle the divisions every 5 or 6 years. Swap OU and Nebraska, tech and CU. Something.
*Games on Big Fox would rock. Games on Fox Sports Net are so badly produced I can swear I see HSE banners in the stadium.
Moe, you are the fucking shit when it comes to this stuff. You convey the feelings I have on the subject with an eloquence normally reserved for the likes of Larry the Cable Guy.
#21
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:14 AM
How bout--
*Move the football title game to Cowboys Stadium permanently. Sorry haters, but the Death Star is already the glamour spot in the stadium universe. It does nothing but help the status of this conference to have the title game every year on that stage. The SEC (*sigh......Moe looks longingly to the east*) has it's title game every year in Atlanta with no problems. Home field advantage hasn't meant a whole lot with that game anyway (see 1997, 1998, 2001
*Move the basketball tourney to KC permanently. The Northern schools are right on this one. The games are better attended in KC and the tourney just don't look right anywhere else.
*Move the women's tourney to San Antonio. Why not? SA is a cool city and close enough to Austin so that those that want to can get their dyke on.
*Move the baseball tourney to OKC. Never been there but I hear the stadium is nice. Good enough for me. Besides, gotta give the Okies something.
*Move un-manly men's sports championships like diving, tennis and sports where a man's crotch is liable to spend extended periods of time on another man's face....like wrestling to a street corner in Oak Lawn or Montrose. All you " Houston-is-Daddy" ass-bandits who want to argue the games would be better attended in Houston will get no argument from me on this one......
#22
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:33 AM
see, one problem with today's game is that everything in football is following the trends of the times. 10 years ago, the big 12 could leverage 3 of the top 7 (tu, OU, and Neb) all-time programs and get good air time on tv. at that time, the big 12 should've acted, but it sat like a bunch of fucks. now the game has surpassed the boring midwest. the big 10 is lucky because they touch the heels of the east, which helps a ton. and the SEC schools are historically easier for athletes to attend, so they get great players which makes great teams and in turn gets good contracts. bottom line is the big 12 should've acted 10-12 years ago but didn't. their top 3 were arguably better than any other top 3 in any conference at the time.
#23
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:40 AM
Edited by Aggies98tards54, 20 May 2010 - 09:43 AM.
#24
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:40 AM
...now that would be some funny shit. Day of the game......team buses pull up to Texas Stadium......and suddenly a collective......"what the fuck?????!!!!. Be just like the Big 12.
#25
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:42 AM
#26
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:43 AM
cowboy stadium, texas stadium, you know what i mean.
#27
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:47 AM
#28
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:49 AM
Then alternate the baseball tourney every year between Rangers Ballpark and Minute Maid and Kauffman Stadium. Keep it in big-time venues to elevate the event.
#29
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:51 AM
Yeah, Texas Stadium was destroyed. Never should have let your ass drive on 183.
#30
Posted 20 May 2010 - 09:56 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












