0
Since this was removed on Texags,
Started by Lloyd Christmas, Dec 14 2008 06:08 PM
7 replies to this topic
#2
-
- core
-
- 3,242 posts
Super Stud
Posted 14 December 2008 - 06:11 PM
can you see what you can do about putting Sammy's sig back up for me, so I can post over there again?
#3
-
- core
-
- 1,827 posts
Super Stud
Posted 15 December 2008 - 12:27 PM
3+, were gonna have to go easy with the sig, or youre gonna end up with a perma ban. Youve bravely (albeit for a short period of time) worn your sig.
Well just go with the bcs banner, mcgee, and stoops sig. That should keep you safe.
Well just go with the bcs banner, mcgee, and stoops sig. That should keep you safe.
#4
-
- core
-
- 3,242 posts
Super Stud
Posted 15 December 2008 - 02:39 PM
"That should keep you safe"
They seemed not to be to happy with this new sig either. - I got banned again this time for using it.
Maybe they think I am mocking McGee....I don't know....but the last email I got from them is " we have warned you several time about your signature, you can now take a 72 "vacation" from Texags.
They seemed not to be to happy with this new sig either. - I got banned again this time for using it.
Maybe they think I am mocking McGee....I don't know....but the last email I got from them is " we have warned you several time about your signature, you can now take a 72 "vacation" from Texags.
#5
-
- core
-
- 5,729 posts
I busted her cherry.
Posted 15 December 2008 - 02:47 PM
QUOTE (Thethreeyardout @ Dec 15 2008, 01:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
"That should keep you safe"
They seemed not to be to happy with this new sig either. - I got banned again this time for using it.
Maybe they think I am mocking McGee....I don't know....but the last email I got from them is " we have warned you several time about your signature, you can now take a 72 "vacation" from Texags.
They seemed not to be to happy with this new sig either. - I got banned again this time for using it.
Maybe they think I am mocking McGee....I don't know....but the last email I got from them is " we have warned you several time about your signature, you can now take a 72 "vacation" from Texags.
That is because you had a pic of a half naked girl in it for a little while.
#7
-
- Admin
-
- 4,066 posts
Registered Midget Offender
- Location:the heterosexual area of Austin, TX
Posted 15 December 2008 - 03:55 PM
As legal counsel for 3+, I am advising him against utilizing any signature in the future.
He made good on his bet by utilizing the signature, and bad intent on Boronkowitz's part has forced my client to be banned on multiple occasions. This excuses performance from any past bet and creates a cause of action against Boronkowitz.
The landmark case of Yards vs. Sammy Badonkadonk is being filed today now that I have some spare time (redhead case settled).
He made good on his bet by utilizing the signature, and bad intent on Boronkowitz's part has forced my client to be banned on multiple occasions. This excuses performance from any past bet and creates a cause of action against Boronkowitz.
The landmark case of Yards vs. Sammy Badonkadonk is being filed today now that I have some spare time (redhead case settled).
Edited by Agent, 15 December 2008 - 03:57 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
