i was under the impression that keelan jackson's injury's brought forth a verdict from the NCAA that they wouldn't give the guy a medical RS year, which resulted in his playing in the final two games.
am i mistaken here? i was pretty confident in this and that it was this reason that he tried to play vs tex and tenn.
not finding anything on the intertron.
anyone know anything?
0
i'm about to get worked over on the recruiting board...
Started by houstontexan, Jul 06 2008 10:17 PM
7 replies to this topic
#2
-
- Members
-
- 1,084 posts
Super Stud
Posted 07 July 2008 - 01:10 PM
no one knows this? i was under the impression that it was implied that keelan wouldn't be getting a med RS, which is explains his return vs. ut and ut.
#3
-
- core
-
- 6,359 posts
Super Stud
Posted 07 July 2008 - 02:49 PM
I'm not sure...hadn't heard. All I know is that Keelan got fucked over and didn't get a medical RS when that shitbag Dvorcaek got one the same year.
#4
-
- core
-
- 4,712 posts
Super Stud
Posted 07 July 2008 - 03:52 PM
QUOTE
i'm about to get worked over
by ultra?
#5
-
- core
-
- 1,634 posts
I need a beer!!
- Location:Looking for my next piece of ass!!
Posted 07 July 2008 - 04:30 PM
very funny.
#6
-
- Members
-
- 1,084 posts
Super Stud
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:56 PM
bohunk, exactly....
those verdicts or "consultations" as the possibility of a med RS year can and do take place during the season, correct?
not only did i originally believe that, but it'd also be weird to play the kid prematurely instead of getting him back for the next year when we'd be even thinner at LB.
those verdicts or "consultations" as the possibility of a med RS year can and do take place during the season, correct?
not only did i originally believe that, but it'd also be weird to play the kid prematurely instead of getting him back for the next year when we'd be even thinner at LB.
#7
-
- core
-
- 6,359 posts
Super Stud
Posted 08 July 2008 - 08:22 AM
QUOTE (houstontexan @ Jul 7 2008, 09:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
bohunk, exactly....
those verdicts or "consultations" as the possibility of a med RS year can and do take place during the season, correct?
not only did i originally believe that, but it'd also be weird to play the kid prematurely instead of getting him back for the next year when we'd be even thinner at LB.
those verdicts or "consultations" as the possibility of a med RS year can and do take place during the season, correct?
not only did i originally believe that, but it'd also be weird to play the kid prematurely instead of getting him back for the next year when we'd be even thinner at LB.
I don't know, but I would guess they can get an informal "consultation" during the year to find out which direction the NCAA was going to lean. Otherwise, it wouldn't have made sense to play him.....but then it WAS Fran.
#8
-
- Members
-
- 1,084 posts
Super Stud
Posted 08 July 2008 - 11:30 AM
this is true. guy could fuck up a wet dream.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
