top 6 big 12 teams
#1
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:19 PM
Texas (11) 8-2 21-4
Kansas St. (18) 8-2 18-6
Texas A&M (16) 6-4 20-5
Baylor 5-5 17-7
Oklahoma 5-5 17-8
remaining schedules:
Kansas
at Oklahoma St.
at Iowa St.
Kansas St.
Texas Tech
at Texas A&M
texas
Texas A&M
Oklahoma
at Kansas St.
at Texas Tech
Nebraska
Oklahoma St.
kstate
at Nebraska
at Baylor
Texas
at Kansas
Colorado
at Iowa St.
A&M
at Texas
Nebraska
Texas Tech
at Oklahoma
at Baylor
Kansas
baylor
at Oklahoma
Kansas St.
at Colorado
Missouri
Texas A&M
at Texas Tech
OU
Baylor
at Texas
at Nebraska
Texas A&M
at Oklahoma St.
Missouri
probably only 5 will make it to the dance. 2 will end up as bubble teams going into the big 12 tourney. i say one out of baylor or OU is nit bound unless they do really good in the tourney
discuss

#2
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:30 PM
#3
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:35 PM

#4
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:36 PM
if texas and kansas both win out it won't be an outright title. kansas will have to lose one

#5
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:39 PM
#6
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:41 PM

#7
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:43 PM
#8
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:44 PM

#9
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:48 PM
#10
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:52 PM

#11
Posted 18 February 2008 - 04:37 PM
#12
Posted 18 February 2008 - 06:34 PM
There is just something not quite right about this team. I can see us losing 4 or even 5 of the last 6.
#13
Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:29 PM
No leader and no decent PG.
#14
Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:43 PM
#15
Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:47 PM
#16
Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:47 PM

#17
Posted 19 February 2008 - 12:57 AM
#18
Posted 23 February 2008 - 05:29 PM
#19
Posted 24 February 2008 - 04:23 PM
If Texas gets a 1 seed and we sneak in with an 8 0r 9 seed, we could always play Texas in the second round if we were in the same bracket.
Longshot, but how much fun would that be?
#20
Posted 24 February 2008 - 07:43 PM

#21
Posted 24 February 2008 - 08:04 PM
Texas gets a one seed it probably won't be in Houston...as stupid as that sounds, but their highest ranked "1 seed" - Tennessee - might be geographically closer to Houston than any other Regional.
That said, I would rather Texas be the highest ranked #2 seed, even though that is bull shit as we have beaten Tennessee handily this year on a neutral court, beaten UCLA at their place and beaten KU at home.
The highest ranked 2 seed might allow us to play closer to home - and with the final 4 and San Antonio...this might be a special year.
Edited by Thethreeyardout, 24 February 2008 - 08:05 PM.
#22
Posted 24 February 2008 - 08:42 PM
tenn gets the midwest
unc-duke gets the east
memphis gets the south
texas-ucla gets the west
still plenty of ball left so nothing's set in stone as of yet. kansas could play their way back to a #1 if texas stumbles. duke and unc could both end up #1's. once the conference tourney's start up it will be more clealy defined as to who the likely #1's are going to be

#23
Posted 25 February 2008 - 12:30 PM
#24
Posted 25 February 2008 - 12:39 PM

#25
Posted 25 February 2008 - 04:32 PM
#26
Posted 25 February 2008 - 04:38 PM

#27
Posted 25 February 2008 - 06:46 PM
#28
Posted 25 February 2008 - 08:20 PM

#29
Posted 25 February 2008 - 09:00 PM
why you gotta keep bringing that shit up?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












